The
influence of the media on the development of children and young people is
hugely increasing. Research has shown that the young sector of the society is psychologically
defenseless against advertising. That
is to say, they
do not appreciate the intent to sell in adverts, so they are not able to judge
whether the product is worthwhile or not.
The advertising
agencies do not seem to care about the possible influence they cause. The
enormous budgets and incomes, provided by the companies interested in promote
their products, give birth to lots of adverts full of positive and negative
influences. However, in my opinion, there are much more negative than positive
ones. For example, some adverts are so well-thought and cunning that many
people feel the necessity to buy the product, regardless the price or the real
utility of it. Young people seem to be much more affected by adverts and
well-known brands, spending huge amounts of money in purchasing these products
in order to be cool or to outstand amongst friends. Furthermore, there are a
lot of techniques to influence the customers (who actually do not usually
realize they are being influenced), as for example the use of powerful slogans
(“Just do it”, “I´m lovin´ it”, “Think different”...) or the use of powerful
images (a pretty girl or a handsome actor who invite you to buy the product).
As far as I am
concerned, I think that there should be a stronger public organism with the
ability of regulating the adverts which are published on the TV and other ways
of media. This organism could be integrated by specialists (such as psychologists)
who would determine whether the advert makes bad impact on the society or it is
a factual way of communication. In this way, I think society could improve...
But it is a pity that this solution is so unrealistic: the companies drive too
much money to elaborate fair adverts.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario